Photo: British actress Rachel Weisz in May. (AP photo)
BOTOX BAN
Oscar-winning actress Rachel Weisz, 39, despises Botox, but her latest suggestion about the wrinkle-fighting drug doesn’t quite make sense.
“It should be banned for actors, as steroids are for sportsmen,” Weisz told the British version of Harpers Bazaar. “Acting is all about expression; why would you want to iron out a frown?”
If you believed Weisz, you’d think that widely reputed Botox user Nicole Kidman is to acting what steroid user Barry Bonds is to baseball. But you’d be wrong.
Steroids give athletes an unfair advantage, which is a prime reason why they’re banned.
Botox doesn’t create such a simple unfair situation. True, the injections confer the advantage of smoothing away wrinkles, but they also can put actors at a disadvantage by limiting their range of expression.
Nicole Kidman isn’t movies’ counterpart to Barry Bonds.
Related links:
- 12 Hollywood stars who reject plastic surgery
- Wrinkle haters expect to get Botox alternatives soon (May 2009)
- Simon Cowell relies on Botox, shuns plastic surgery and hair color
- Botox, fillers more popular worldwide; growth slowing in U.S.
- 9 challenges to the reign of King Botox
- How facial-fold fighter Evolence will change cosmetic market
Popular slide shows:
- The good, the ugly in photos of tattooed makeup
- Kim Kardashian photos — ample or too much?
- Botox Bandits, Big-Bust Bandit photos
- Before Joan Rivers was plastic surgery queen …
- Jennifer Aniston, so little changed from 20s to 40
- Sophia Loren’s glamour, age 22 to 74
- Many facets of Angelina Jolie
- Styles of Rihanna
Such an in depth subject.
Nottttttttttttt.
What Rachel said does make sense, you just don’t get it.
it should be banned…period!